The Board has determined that pterygium of the right eye was incurred in service due to exposure to sunlight, dust and wind while serving as a heavy construction equipment operator.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's in-service treatment records confirm his exposure to sun, wind and dust during service which is considered the cause of his current condition.
- Claimed conditions
- pterygium of the right eye
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 8, 2017
- Citation
- 1750971
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1750971.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's pterygium of the right eye is currently rated at 10 percent, but does not meet criteria for a higher rating due to lack of incapacitating episodes and visual impairment.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for eye disorder and disability manifested by swelling in the lower extremities, to include as secondary to service-connected hypertension due to inadequate medical opinions.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for pterygium of the right eye was denied as there is no evidence that it is related to his military service.,His claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for hairy cell leukemia was denied due to lack of anemia or aplastic anemia, and he currently has a non-compensable rating for this condition.,The Veteran's claim for erectile dysfunction associated with prostate cancer residuals was denied as there is no evidence of penis deformity. The Veteran had a 20 percent rating initially but it was increased to 40 percent due to voiding dysfunction, which he now contends requires changing absorbent materials more than four times per day.,The Veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 60 percent for prostate cancer residuals since specific dates were denied as his condition is currently rated at the maximum allowable level.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development to ensure that all relevant evidence has been considered and the current severity of his bilateral shoulder disabilities, pseudofolliculitis barbae, and keloids have been assessed. The right eye pterygium claim will also be addressed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.