Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of compliance with previous instructions and the need for an addendum opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's bilateral knee disorder.

The deciding factor: The VA examiner failed to address the Veteran's reports of his in-service injury as factual, despite the absence of treatment records. The Board instructed the examiner to provide an addendum opinion addressing these issues.

Claimed conditions
bilateral knee disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 15, 2017
Citation
1752272

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1752272.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.