The Veteran was granted a TDIU, effective December 2, 2010. The attorney's fees were properly withheld as per the signed fee agreement.
The deciding factor: The award of TDIU resulted in an appropriate withholding of attorney fees based on the signed fee agreement and the representation provided by the attorney during the appeal process.
- Claimed conditions
- Acquired psychiatric disorder (including depression)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 60%
- Decision date
- November 17, 2017
- Citation
- 1752999
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1752999.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the Veteran's appeals regarding an evaluation for pseudo folliculitis barbae and an earlier effective date. The Board also granted service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including depression.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claims for service connection for acquired psychiatric disorder, jammed left shoulder, chronic right elbow disability, chronic left elbow disability, chronic right knee disability, chronic left knee disability, and unspecified joint disease. These claims are now remanded to allow for further development.,The Board also dismissed the claim of entitlement to service connection for diverticulitis.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded several issues for further development and consideration, including service connection claims for an acquired psychiatric disorder (including depression), diabetes mellitus, and tinnitus.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for additional development due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder and sleep apnea. The claims are being returned to the AOJ for further review.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.