The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD, was denied as there is no credible supporting evidence of in-service stressors.,Service connection for elevated liver enzymes (claimed as idiopathic liver disease) was not granted due to lack of a current diagnosis and no evidence linking the condition to service.,The Veteran's hypertension was found to be manifested by blood pressure readings of 150 systolic and 95 diastolic, which do not meet criteria for a compensable rating under Diagnostic Code 7101.,For pseudofolliculitis barbae with facial scars, the Veteran did not meet the criteria for a 50% evaluation as there was no visible or palpable tissue loss and asymmetry of two features or paired sets of features.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's claimed in-service stressors were not supported by credible evidence.,There is no current diagnosis for elevated liver enzymes, and the condition has been ruled out as a result of alcohol use over 18 years ago.,The Veteran's hypertension did not meet the criteria for a higher rating under Diagnostic Code 7101 due to controlled blood pressure readings.,The Veteran's scars were found to be less than the required characteristics of disfigurement for a 50% evaluation.
- Claimed conditions
- acquired psychiatric disorder, elevated liver enzymes, hypertension, pseudofolliculitis barbae
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 21, 2017
- Citation
- 1753529
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1753529.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development regarding the Veteran's service connection claim for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including VA examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for additional development due to conflicting opinions regarding service connection for peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, and skin disabilities related to herbicide exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.