The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including obtaining a VA medical opinion to clarify the etiology of his claimed neurological disorder and updating treatment records from Huntington VAMC.
The deciding factor: The claim requires clarification regarding the etiology of the Veteran's neurological disorder due to service-connected MFW residuals and updated treatment records are needed.
- Claimed conditions
- neurological disorder of the right upper extremity
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 28, 2017
- Citation
- 1754135
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1754135.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board has denied service connection for neurological disorders of the right upper, left lower, and right lower extremities as there is no evidence showing these conditions were incurred or aggravated by active service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that a VA examination and medical opinion for neurological disorders of the upper and lower extremities on a direct basis, to include consideration of the Veteran's presumed in-service exposure to environmental hazards during his period of service in the Persian Gulf War, should have been provided prior to the July 2019 VA rating decision on appeal.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for nerve damage, dermis, right side of face and a neurological disorder of the right upper extremity are remanded due to conflicting medical evidence regarding current diagnoses. A VA examination is needed to determine the etiology of any diagnosed conditions.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a neurological disorder of the right upper extremity, finding that there was no evidence to support a secondary relationship between his service-connected mine fragment wound residuals and his current condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.