The Veteran's lung disorder is presumed to be due to his in-service exposure to Agent Orange. However, the preponderance of evidence does not support a finding that his current lung disorder is etiologically related to service or his in-service exposure to Agent Orange. The Board also found no new and material evidence to reopen the claim for gunshot wound residuals.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's lung disorder was presumed to be due to his in-service exposure to Agent Orange, but there is insufficient evidence to establish a direct link between his current lung disorder and service or his in-service exposure to Agent Orange. The Board also found no new and material evidence to reopen the claim for gunshot wound residuals.
- Claimed conditions
- lung disorder, gunshot wound residuals
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 28, 2017
- Citation
- 1754381
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1754381.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for service connection for lung and lumbar spine disorders have been dismissed due to his withdrawal of the appeals prior to the promulgation of a decision.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected lung disorder and anxiety and delusional disorders render her incapable of obtaining and maintaining gainful employment as of July 2, 2025. Prior to that date, the evidence does not show she was unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation due solely to her service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for lung, heart, and prostate disorders due to exposure to ionizing radiation in service. The claims were found not to be related to the Veteran's service.
- Denied
The Veteran's lung disorder was not incurred in service and no presumption of service connection applies. The Board denied the claim as there is no current showing of a lung disorder at any time during the appeal period.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.