The Board has determined that the Veteran's axonal type motor polyneuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities is not related to herbicide exposure in service and therefore denied both claims for service connection.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner concluded that the Veteran's axonal type motor polyneuropathy was less likely as not due to Agent Orange exposure, based on its onset 34 years after service and post-service alcohol abuse history.
- Claimed conditions
- right lower extremity axonal type motor polyneuropathy, left lower extremity axonal type motor polyneuropathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 30, 2017
- Citation
- 1755050
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1755050.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral lower extremity axonal type motor polyneuropathy are being remanded due to the need for additional development and an addendum to the VA medical opinion.
- Granted
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claims for service connection for right and left lower extremity axonal type motor polyneuropathy, as new and material evidence has been received. The case is remanded to schedule a VA examination and obtain additional medical records.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.