The Board found that the Veteran's right eye disorders, including congenital cataract, sensory exotropia, nystagmus, posterior vitreous detachment, amblyopia, microphthalmia, and right large angle strabismus, did not meet the criteria for service connection as they are not related to active service.
The deciding factor: The Board determined that the Veteran's right eye disorders were congenital in nature and thus preexisted service. The evidence did not show any aggravation of these conditions during service or a superimposed disease/injury resulting in additional disability.
- Claimed conditions
- Congenital cataract, Sensory exotropia, Nystagmus, Posterior vitreous detachment, Amblyopia, Microphthalmia, Right large angle strabismus
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 8, 2018
- Citation
- 1800886
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1800886.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's right eye visual field loss is due to an in-service injury, and thus service connection for this condition is granted.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a lack of a VA examination and medical opinion, as the Veteran's current right eye vision disability is presumed to be related to his service. The examiner will need to determine if the disabilities are related to his in-service evaluation for ocular motility.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient clarification of the Veteran's left eye visual acuity measurements and the need for additional opinions regarding the nature and etiology of his claimed conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claim for service connection for a bilateral eye disability, including as due to exposure to herbicide and chemical agents. The case is being returned for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.