The Veteran and the Appellant were spouses who cohabitated through October 31, 2011. The Veteran terminated the Appellant's access to his VA benefits in December 2011, including those paid for dependents.,J.B., born on November [REDACTED], 2007, is a biological child of the Veteran and the Appellant. The preponderance of evidence supports that the Veteran has not reasonably discharged his responsibility for J.B.'s support since December 1, 2011.,D.P., T.P., and D.P. ceased being the Veteran's stepchildren for VA purposes on November 1, 2011. The preponderance of evidence supports that they have not been eligible for support from the Veteran since then.
The deciding factor: The preponderance of the evidence supports the finding that the Veteran did not reasonably discharge his responsibility for support to the Appellant and J.B., but has continued to provide reasonable support to D.P., T.P., and D.P.
- Claimed conditions
- Dependents support (including J.B.), Support for former stepchildren (D.P., T.P., and D.P.)
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 10, 2018
- Citation
- 1801669
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1801669.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.