Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's hypertension is being remanded for additional development to determine if it is related to service, including herbicide exposure, or secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus.

The deciding factor: An opinion is needed regarding the etiology of the Veteran's hypertension, specifically whether it is due to in-service herbicide exposure or secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus.

Claimed conditions
Hypertension
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
Burn pits / airborne hazards
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 12, 2018
Citation
1802924

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1802924.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.