Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's surviving spouse was granted an aid and attendance allowance, but the Appellant is not entitled to additional accrued benefits as he does not meet the legal definition of a child for this purpose. The only other category under which accrued benefits are payable is in the form of reimbursement to cover the costs of the last sickness or burial of the beneficiary.

The deciding factor: The Appellant is an adult son and thus not considered a child eligible for accrued benefits under VA regulations.

Claimed conditions
Not specified in this decision
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 24, 2018
Citation
1804501

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1804501.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.