The Veteran's claim for service connection for mild bronchiectasis of both lung bases and in the right upper lobe is being remanded due to the need for further development regarding his exposure to asbestos during service. The claim for reopening a claim for bilateral pulmonary nodules (also claimed as pleural disease) is also being remanded.
The deciding factor: Further development is needed to determine the Veteran's exposure to asbestos and ionizing radiation, which may be relevant to his lung conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- mild bronchiectasis of both lung bases and in the right upper lobe, bilateral pulmonary nodules
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 24, 2018
- Citation
- 1804569
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1804569.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected asthma including bilateral pulmonary nodules is granted a rating of 100 percent, the schedular maximum.
- Denied
The Board denied the appellant's claims for service connection for tuberculosis and bilateral pulmonary nodules, finding that these conditions were not incurred in or aggravated by active service and were due to medications taken for his nonservice-connected psoriatic arthritis.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's lung condition, diagnosed as bilateral pulmonary nodules, is being remanded for additional development including obtaining treatment records and providing a new VA examination to determine if the condition is related to service exposure to Agent Orange.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.