The Board has denied service connection for heart disease as the Veteran's current heart disorders are not shown to have onset earlier than many years after service and are not caused or aggravated by any service-connected disorder.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found that PTSD and sleep deprivation did not cause or aggravate the Veteran's current heart disorders, including arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy.
- Claimed conditions
- Heart arrhythmia, Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 31, 2018
- Citation
- 1806293
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1806293.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for Tachy-Brady syndrome, atrial fibrillation, and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy due to an inadequate VA examination and a need for additional evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 30 percent for his heart disability is being remanded due to the need for additional VA treatment records from non-VA providers and a complete copy of records from Yakima Memorial Heart, Lung, and Vascular.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board previously denied the claim for service connection for CHF. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court) has remanded the case due to an inadequate statement of reasons or bases regarding the adequacy of the August 2021 VA examination, which did not consider the recent holding in Spicer v. McDonough.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's heart disability is currently rated at 30 percent, and the Board has decided to remand the case for a new examination due to an indication of worsening symptoms.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.