The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to an inadequate statement of reasons or bases in the September 2016 decision and because the August 2014 VA examination was not adequate.
The deciding factor: The Court found that the Board's September 2016 decision did not provide a sufficient analysis regarding the Veteran's August 2014 testimony about his service-related leg and hip problems, and the August 2014 VA examination was inadequate for rating purposes as it did not address this testimony.
- Claimed conditions
- nerve damage of the left leg
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 5, 2018
- Citation
- 1807348
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1807348.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for nerve damage of both legs and bilateral flat feet due to a procedural error in notifying the Veteran of his right to a hearing.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for bilateral hearing loss, hypertension, blood clots of the right and left legs, and nerve damage of the left leg due to new evidence submitted by the Veteran.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder was reopened due to the submission of new and material evidence. The claims for service connection for nerve damage of the right leg, left leg, arthritis of the legs, diabetes mellitus, lymphoma, deviated septum, digestive disability, and hernia disability were all granted.
- Partly granted
The Board found that new and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen the previously denied claims for service connection of nerve damage to the bilateral hands, left leg, color blindness, and cataracts.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.