Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Board found that the Veteran's status-post excision melanoma of middle-to-lower back was not incurred in or aggravated by active service and may not be presumed to have been so incurred or aggravated due to herbicide exposure.

The deciding factor: The VA examiner opined that the Veteran's melanoma was less likely caused by his time on active duty, including exposure to herbicides such as Agent Orange.

Claimed conditions
status-post excision melanoma of middle-to-lower back
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 6, 2018
Citation
1807792

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1807792.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.