The Board denied service connection for a bilateral hip disorder and an increased rating for diabetes mellitus II, finding that the disorders are not related to service or service-connected conditions.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found no evidence of secondary service connection due to the Veteran's knee disabilities and noted that his DMII does not require regulation of activities.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral Hip Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus II
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 20%
- Decision date
- April 19, 2018
- Citation
- 18100704
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18100704.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities result in the permanent loss of use of his left foot and upper right extremity, allowing for entitlement to an allowance for an automobile or other conveyance and adaptive equipment.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including PTSD, obstructive sleep apnea, diabetes mellitus II, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and erectile dysfunction associated with PTSD, rendered him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation for the entire appeal period. The Board granted his TDIU claim.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD, bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and a bilateral hip disorder due to issues with the evidence and need for further medical opinions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for COPD and an increased rating for CAD. The COPD claim requires a retrospective opinion considering all conceded in-service exposures, including those not previously discussed (e.g., industrial solvent, PCBs, vibration, noise, CARC Paint, PFAS, and Radiation). The CAD claim requires issuance of a Supplemental Statement of the Case addressing entitlement to a higher rating.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.