The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for bilateral hip and knee disabilities, finding that there was no relationship between these conditions and his service-connected back disability or active duty service.
The deciding factor: The VA examiners found that gait changes during flare-ups of the service-connected back disability were not expected to cause the Veteran’s bilateral hip and knee disabilities.
- Claimed conditions
- left and right hip disability, left and right knee disability
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 27, 2018
- Citation
- 18101082
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18101082.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeal due to being 100% disabled and did not want to continue with the hearing and appeal process.
- Granted
The Veteran's request for an extension of time to file a VA Form 10182 seeking to appeal the April 2021 rating decision was granted. The May 23, 2023 form is deemed timely.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss on an extraschedular basis was denied due to his failure to report for VA examinations. The claim for TDIU on an extraschedular basis was also denied as the Veteran did not complete the necessary application and there is no indication he is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found the VA Centralized Eligibility and Appeals Team (CEAT) review inadequate to support the decision made, as it did not address whether the Veteran requires personal care services each time he completes one or more activities of daily living (ADLs). The case is remanded for an updated CEAT review.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.