Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination and need for updated medical records. The Veteran's heart conditions, including ischemic heart disease, are being evaluated again.

The deciding factor: The VA examiner needs to provide a new opinion on whether the Veteran's diagnosed heart conditions are at least as likely as not related to service, including herbicide exposure.

Claimed conditions
ischemic heart disease, congestive cardiomyopathy, left bundle branch block
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 27, 2018
Citation
18101091

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18101091.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.