The Board denied the Veteran's claim of service connection for bilateral leg arthritis, finding that new and material evidence had not been received to reopen the claim. The TDIU claim was granted from July 16, 2008.
The deciding factor: New and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the claim for service connection for bilateral leg arthritis.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral leg arthritis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 14, 2018
- Citation
- 1810246
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1810246.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for bilateral leg and hip arthritis, as well as a TDIU claim, due to inadequate medical opinions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied a higher rating for pes planus and remanded the issues of service connection for bilateral leg arthritis, bilateral hip arthritis, and TDIU.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied service connection for ulcers and remanded the claims of bilateral leg arthritis and peripheral vascular disease due to lack of current diagnoses. The cases are being returned to VA for further development.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's appeal for service connection on the merits of multiple claimed conditions was denied in a December 2015 rating decision. The Veteran did not file a timely Notice of Disagreement (NOD) within one year after receiving notice of this decision, and thus his appeal is dismissed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.