Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's stooped posture, left upper extremity disorder, right upper extremity disorder, and right lower extremity disorder are all rated at 20 percent each. The Board has determined that none of these conditions warrant a higher rating.,The Veteran’s left upper extremity disorder is currently rated at 20 percent. The evidence does not show symptoms equivalent to moderate incomplete paralysis in the upper left extremity, which would warrant a higher rating.,The Veteran's right upper extremity disorder is currently rated at 40 percent. The evidence does not show symptoms equivalent to severe incomplete paralysis in the right upper extremity, which would warrant a higher rating.,The Veteran’s right lower extremity disorder is currently rated at 20 percent. The evidence does not show symptoms equivalent to moderately severe incomplete paralysis in the right lower extremity, which would warrant a higher rating.

The deciding factor: The evidence did not demonstrate forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine to 30 degrees or less, nor was there any evidence of limitation of motion or incapacitating episodes that would warrant a higher rating for stooped posture.,The evidence did not show symptoms akin to moderate incomplete paralysis in the upper left extremity, which would warrant a higher rating for the left upper extremity disorder.,The evidence did not demonstrate symptoms akin to severe incomplete paralysis in the right upper extremity, which would warrant a higher rating for the right upper extremity disorder.,The evidence did not show symptoms akin to moderately severe incomplete paralysis in the right lower extremity, which would warrant a higher rating for the right lower extremity disorder.

Claimed conditions
stooped posture, left upper extremity disorder, right upper extremity disorder, right lower extremity disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 22, 2018
Citation
18104524

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18104524.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.