The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate consideration of past medical records and a need for a new examination. The Veteran's skin conditions are being reviewed, but service connection is not granted.
The deciding factor: Service treatment records do not document a recurrent skin condition, and VA examinations have failed to adequately consider past medical records supporting the claim.
- Claimed conditions
- Skin Disorder, Rash of the Face, Rash of the Hands, Rash of the Feet
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 29, 2018
- Citation
- 18105835
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18105835.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for asthma and a skin disorder are being remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions considering the totality of his military exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for Hypertension (HTN), a Skin Disorder, and a Cranial Meningioma due to further medical examination and opinion regarding their etiology. The claims are currently pending.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including PTSD, OSA, and peripheral neuropathies, prevented him from securing and maintaining substantially gainful employment as of January 5, 2015. The Board grants TDIU effective that date.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's skin disorder covered more than 40 percent of his total body area and exposed areas from September 15, 2016, to February 5, 2019. The Board granted a rating of 60 percent disabled for this period.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.