Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claim for PTSD is remanded due to the need for a VA examination and addendum opinion.,The Veteran's claim for Parkinson's disease is remanded due to the need for a VA examination and review of private treatment records.,The Veteran's claim for COPD is remanded due to the need for a VA examination.,The Veteran's claim for extreme joint pain is remanded due to the need for a VA examination.,The Veteran's claim for skin disorder, to include malignant melanomas, is remanded due to the need for a VA examination and review of private treatment records.,The Veteran's claim for rectal impact surgery as secondary to service-connected organic aphonia is remanded due to the need for an addendum opinion.

The deciding factor: VA has not provided sufficient evidence regarding the Veteran’s PTSD diagnosis in accordance with DSM-5 criteria and needs further examination.,The Veteran's private treatment records are needed to determine if he has a current diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, as his VA records indicate only mild tremors.,The Veteran needs an additional VA examination to assess whether his COPD is related to service exposure in Thailand.,The Veteran needs an additional VA examination to evaluate the impact of his joint pain on his daily life and determine if it constitutes a disability.,The Veteran needs an additional VA examination to determine if his skin disorder, including malignant melanomas, are related to service exposure to chemicals.,An addendum opinion is needed from the March 2013 examiner to address whether the Veteran's rectal impact surgery was directly caused by his stroke.

Claimed conditions
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Parkinson's disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Extreme joint pain, Skin disorder, to include malignant melanomas, Rectal impact surgery
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 31, 2018
Citation
18106633

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18106633.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.