The Board denied an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for Meniere’s disease, finding that no CUE was present in a June 25, 1986 rating decision granting service connection for right peripheral vestibular disorder and assigning a 10 percent disability rating.
The deciding factor: The Board found no clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in the June 25, 1986 rating decision that granted service connection for right peripheral vestibular disorder and assigned an initial 10 percent disability rating.
- Claimed conditions
- Meniere’s disease, right peripheral vestibular disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- June 1, 2018
- Citation
- 18107203
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18107203.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for Meniere’s disease, finding that the Veteran's current condition did not manifest during service and is not related to his service-connected left ear hearing loss. Service connection was also denied for ear infections.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for Meniere’s disease, finding that it did not onset during his service or within a year of his discharge and is not shown to be otherwise related to his service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claim for a new examination and opinion due to inadequate previous examinations, and will consider whether Meniere’s disease is related to service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequacy with the new opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's vertigo and dizziness. The matter is being returned for an addendum opinion from the same clinician who provided a previous opinion, addressing both the Veteran’s reports and in-service letters as pieces of evidence.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.