The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for his left elbow disability prior to October 4, 2013 and after December 1, 2013 is being remanded due to the need for additional development including obtaining medical records and conducting an orthopedic examination.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner was not able to conduct a thorough evaluation of the Veteran's left elbow disability as there were no flare-ups reported during the January 2015 VA examination, which is required by the Court in Sharp v. Shulkin (2017).
- Claimed conditions
- epicondylitis of the left elbow
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 1, 2018
- Citation
- 18107253
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18107253.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's prescribed topical skin medication, triamcinolone cream, caused irreparable damage to his clothing and the Board granted a clothing allowance for 2020 based on this.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an initial disability rating in excess of 10 percent for left elbow epicondylitis is being remanded due to the need for additional information and a new VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development due to insufficient detail in the VA examinations and a recent private medical opinion suggesting service connection for pes planus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded three cases involving the Veteran's elbow and bilateral knees due to incomplete range of motion testing in previous examinations. The claims are being returned for further examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.