The Board denied an extra-schedular evaluation for service-connected alopecia areata, finding that the evidence did not show exceptional or unusual disability picture with related factors such as marked interference with employment.,The Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected alopecia areata prior to March 26, 2014 was also denied. The Board found that the evidence did not show he was unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation by reason of his service-connected alopecia areata.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's service-connected alopecia areata is rated under the regular schedular criteria, which adequately describes the severity and symptomatology exhibited. The Board found that the evidence did not show marked interference with employment to warrant an extraschedular evaluation.,Prior to March 26, 2014, the Veteran had a combined disability rating of 60 percent due to alopecia areata (50%), psychiatric disorder (10%), and other conditions. The Board found that his service-connected alopecia areata did not cause him to be unemployable.
- Claimed conditions
- alopecia areata
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 50%
- Decision date
- June 4, 2018
- Citation
- 18107740
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18107740.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for alopecia areata was dismissed because she submitted a request for Higher Level Review (HLR) before filing her Notice of Disagreement, which constitutes an impermissible concurrent election.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for an increased disability rating for other specified stressor and trauma related disorder, as well as service connection for alopecia areata, were both denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a 100% disability rating for the former condition or establish service connection for the latter.
- Granted
Service connection for obstructive sleep apnea is granted.,Service connection for bilateral hearing loss disability, to include as due to exposure to ionizing radiation, asbestos, and lead paint, is denied.,Service connection for alopecia areata, to include as due to exposure to ionizing radiation, asbestos, and lead paint, is denied.,Secondary service connection for fatigue (claimed as fatigue) is granted.,Secondary service connection for cognitive slowing (claimed as memory and concentration difficulties) is granted.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for hair loss (alopecia areata) as secondary to service-connected prostate cancer. The Veteran's other claims of service connection for various conditions related to Gulf War exposure were denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.