The Board found that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus type II was not incurred or aggravated during active duty, is not proximately due to, the result of, or aggravated by a service-connected disability, and its incurrence or aggravation during active duty may not be presumed.
The deciding factor: There is no evidence showing DM in service, and it is not related to any service-connected disabilities. The Veteran's current DM diagnosis does not meet the criteria for presumptive service connection due to herbicide exposure or environmental toxins.
- Claimed conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus Type II (DM)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 21, 2018
- Citation
- 1810790
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1810790.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the appellant's request for attorney fees based on past-due benefits awarded in the May 2024 rating decision, as the claims were not related to service connection.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for a higher rating and service connection for migraines, hypertension, diabetes mellitus type II, and a gastrointestinal disorder.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied service connection for bilateral hearing loss, a skin disorder, and migraines. The claims of service connection for diabetes mellitus type II (DM), peripheral neuropathy of right lower extremity (RLE), and peripheral neuropathy of left lower extremity (LLE) are REMANDED.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to make a decision on the Veteran's claims for service connection for OSA and DM, Type II. The Veteran was not provided with VA examinations or opinions regarding these conditions due to pre-decisional duty-to-assist errors.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.