Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has determined that a remand is necessary to obtain an addendum opinion regarding the aggravation of the Veteran's bilateral foot conditions by service, and to obtain any relevant treatment records.

The deciding factor: The October 2014 VA examination report was inadequate for adjudication purposes as it did not address the Veteran's statements that his symptoms became worse in the last few years of his service.

Claimed conditions
pes planus, plantar fasciitis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 21, 2018
Citation
1810796

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1810796.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.