Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board denied service connection for bilateral hip strain with degenerative changes and an earlier effective date for calcified herniated L5-S1, status post laminectomy, lumbar spine. The Veteran's claim of service connection for bilateral foot pain is remanded.,Service connection was not granted for bilateral hip strain due to lack of a causal relationship between the disability and the service-connected lumbar spine disability. An earlier effective date than November 7, 2007, for calcified herniated L5-S1, status post laminectomy, lumbar spine is denied.,Service connection was not granted for bilateral foot pain due to insufficient evidence regarding whether any of the Veteran's foot conditions are proximately caused or aggravated by his service-connected lumbar spine disability.

The deciding factor: The preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding that the bilateral hip strain is proximately due to or the result of, or aggravated beyond its natural progression by the service-connected lumbar spine disability.,An earlier effective date for calcified herniated L5-S1, status post laminectomy, lumbar spine cannot be granted as it would violate regulations regarding reopened claims and final decisions.,The Veteran's bilateral foot pain was not supported by sufficient evidence to establish a causal relationship with the service-connected lumbar spine disability.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hip strain with degenerative changes, calcified herniated L5-S1, status post laminectomy, lumbar spine, bilateral foot pain (plantar fasciitis and metatarsalgia)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 8, 2018
Citation
18109551

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18109551.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.