The Board has remanded both issues related to the Veteran's knees due to inadequate examination findings and the passage of time since previous examinations.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found that a VA examination is needed for both knees as the previous examination did not include necessary tests and was conducted too long ago.
- Claimed conditions
- Right-knee disorder, Left-knee disorder
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 12, 2018
- Citation
- 18110430
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18110430.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for hearing loss and skin condition (claimed as jungle rot) were dismissed due to his withdrawal of these claims.,Service connection was granted for cervical-spine disorder with associated left-upper-extremity radiculopathy, lumbar-spine disorder with associated right and left-lower-extremity radiculopathy, and right-knee disorder, all secondary to service-connected bilateral pes planus and hallux valgus.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for right-knee and left-knee disorders, finding that the Veteran's current knee conditions were not incurred or aggravated by his active military service.
- Denied
The Veteran's right-knee disorder was found to have noncompensable limitation of flexion and full extension prior to June 7, 2019. As of June 7, 2019, the Veteran had significant limitation of extension with no findings of ankylosis, instability or subluxation.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that the Veteran's claims for increased disability rating and service connection are not properly adjudicated based on the current evidence, and thus remanded for further examination and opinion.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.