Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for tinnitus is denied as there is no current diagnosis of tinnitus and the preponderance of evidence does not support a finding that his tinnitus is related to service.,The Veteran's chronic renal condition, characterized as chronic kidney disease stage three with left kidney stone, is remanded due to lack of an examination. The examiner must determine if it is at least as likely as not that the condition is attributable to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.,The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder (PTSD, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder) is remanded for a VA mental health examination. The examiner must provide an opinion on whether any diagnosed acquired psychiatric disorder is related to service or exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.

The deciding factor: The Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of tinnitus and there is no evidence linking his tinnitus to service.,There is insufficient medical evidence to determine the cause of the chronic renal condition, but it is presumed that exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune occurred. The examiner must provide an opinion on whether this exposure caused or contributed to the Veteran's condition.,The Veteran has not been diagnosed with PTSD and there are no verified stressors. However, he may still be entitled to service connection for his acquired psychiatric disorder if it is found to be related to service or exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, chronic renal condition (stage three with left kidney stone), acquired psychiatric disorder (PTSD, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
Camp Lejeune water
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 13, 2018
Citation
18110598

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18110598.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.