Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claims for service connection related to heart disability, right leg disability, urinary condition, bilateral feet disability, and acquired psychiatric disorder are remanded due to the loss of his VA claims file.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a right leg disability is remanded as there was no VA examination provided. The Veteran has reported symptoms of shin pain during service.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for urinary condition is remanded as he did not receive a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of his condition, including whether it is related to exposure to herbicide agents.,The Veteran's claims for bilateral feet disability are remanded due to lack of VA examinations. The Veteran has reported symptoms such as tumors and numbness in his feet during service.,The Veteran's claim for an acquired psychiatric disorder is remanded as he did not receive a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of his condition, including whether it is related to personal assault.

The deciding factor: The claims file was lost by VA due to no fault of the Veteran. The Board acknowledges that attempts were made to rebuild the folder but conflicting records suggest additional attempts should be made.,VA only provided examinations for PTSD and diabetes, despite the Veteran's reports of related symptoms and diagnoses in his claims file.,The Veteran did not receive a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of his urinary condition. The Board notes that there are various diagnosed conditions but no examination was conducted.,The Veteran did not receive a VA examination for his bilateral feet disability. The Board acknowledges that he has reported symptoms such as tumors and numbness in his feet during service.,The Veteran's claim for an acquired psychiatric disorder is remanded due to lack of VA examinations. The Veteran reports personal assault, but the VA examiners did not address this aspect.

Claimed conditions
heart disability, right leg disability, urinary condition, bilateral foot disability, acquired psychiatric disorder
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
June 18, 2018
Citation
18111923

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18111923.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.