The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for additional development, including obtaining updated VA and private treatment records and scheduling a VA examination.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's representative indicated that the Veteran’s symptoms are worsening and increasing in frequency since the last VA examination. The Board found this information sufficient to warrant further development.
- Claimed conditions
- Vascular Headaches
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 22, 2018
- Citation
- 18113362
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18113362.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's claims for service connection of vascular headaches, back disability, and bilateral plantar fasciitis have been remanded due to insufficient evidence. The current rating decisions do not address the assigned ratings or effective dates.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for vascular headaches was denied as there were no characteristic prostrating attacks averaging 1 in 2 months over any several months during the appeal period.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected vascular headaches did not manifest as characteristic prostrating attacks, and thus a compensable evaluation is denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service-connected vascular headaches and sinusitis are granted a rating of 30 percent, but not higher, from February 27, 2012. The claim for increased rating for lumbar degenerative disc disease is remanded due to inadequate VA examination reports. The TDIU claim is also remanded as it is inextricably intertwined with the increased rating claim.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.