The Board has denied service connection for the cause of death due to lack of evidence linking coronary atherosclerosis to service or presumed exposure to herbicides. The DIC claim is remanded as it requires additional development, including obtaining relevant court records and medical opinions.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's death was not caused by VA treatment but may have been related to his hepatitis C antiviral therapy which he consented to before undergoing the treatment.
- Claimed conditions
- Coronary atherosclerosis
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 22, 2018
- Citation
- 18113562
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18113562.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's claimed exposure to toxic environmental agents and the applicability of the PACT Act. The VA must now attempt to obtain relevant records from Brooke Army Medical Center.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board granted service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death effective July 30, 2015, which is the date the appellant filed her claim. The effective date was set based on VA regulations regarding claims received within one year of a veteran's death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the VA Centralized Eligibility and Appeals Team (CEAT) decision denying eligibility for PCAFC benefits was inadequate, as it did not address whether the Veteran requires personal care services each time he completes one or more activities of daily living (ADLs). The case is being remanded to conduct an updated medical review.
- Whole decision: Granted
Service connection for ischemic heart disease, to include coronary atherosclerosis, is granted due to presumed exposure to herbicide agent during service in Korea. The Veteran's skin cancer and hearing loss are remanded for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.