The Veteran's anxiety disorder, not otherwise specified, is rated at 50 percent. The Board granted a separate compensable rating for bruxism but denied an increased rating for the psychiatric disability.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found that the Veteran’s symptoms of anxiety and impaired judgment resulted in occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity.
- Claimed conditions
- Anxiety Disorder, not otherwise specified, Bruxism
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 50%
- Decision date
- June 25, 2018
- Citation
- 18113672
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18113672.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including GAD, MDD, bruxism, migraines/headaches, tinnitus, hip pain, iliotibial band syndrome, and leg stress fractures. The evidence does not support current diagnoses of these conditions during the appeal period.
- Dismissed
The appeal for an initial rating in excess of 70 percent for the service-connected mental health disorder is dismissed. The Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance is granted.
- Denied
Service connection for PTSD is denied.,The issue of entitlement to service connection for head trauma and memory loss is dismissed due to concurrent election. The Veteran's claim for adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, which is inextricably intertwined with the PTSD claim, is also remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to errors in obtaining relevant VA treatment records and for the need of an additional medical opinion. The appellant's claim is related to PTSD with bruxism, and the AOJ must obtain all outstanding private treatment records from VA electronic databases and provide a new medical opinion on the severity of his psychiatric disorder prior to February 7, 2023.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.