The Board has remanded the case due to a missing informed consent document for the right total hip arthroplasty, which is required to proceed with the claim.
The deciding factor: The original signed informed consent document was not found in the claims file and there is no evidence that VA attempted to obtain it from Vista Imaging.
- Claimed conditions
- infection
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 2, 2018
- Citation
- 18115383
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18115383.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the VA medical opinion obtained in October 2023 is inadequate and constitutes a pre-decisional duty to assist error. The Veteran's claim of entitlement to compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C. 1151 for infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal right knee prosthesis, due to treatment by VA, is remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for various conditions, including hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus (DMII), skin rash, infection, cardiomyopathy, fluid around the heart, mesothelioma, and PTSD. The AOJ is required to verify the Veteran's exposure to toxins, including asbestos, and herbicide agents during his active service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for an infection, status post total right knee replacement is denied because he did not have a current disability characterized as an infection of the right knee during the claim period.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found deficiencies in a previous VA medical opinion and has ordered a remand to obtain an addendum opinion regarding the Veteran's right shoulder complications following his surgery. The Veteran contends that he suffered additional disability due to unqualified personnel administering a Cortisone injection several months after his surgery.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.