Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's claim for impaired fasting glucose was denied as it is not a disability for VA compensation purposes.,PTSD service connection was granted with an effective date of December 29, 2016. An earlier effective date prior to this date was denied.,An initial PTSD rating in excess of 10 percent was denied.,Bilateral pes planus service connection was granted with an effective date of April 29, 2011. An earlier effective date prior to this date was denied.,Service connection for a skin disability was denied.,Allergic rhinitis was granted as related to the Veteran's active service.,The claims for cervical spine and sinus disabilities were reopened.

The deciding factor: Impaired fasting glucose is not considered a disability for VA compensation purposes, being only a laboratory finding. The Veteran did not provide evidence of a current disability.,PTSD was granted effective December 29, 2016, as the date of receipt of claim. An earlier effective date prior to this date was denied due to lack of formal or informal claims before this date.,The initial PTSD rating in excess of 10 percent was denied because the Veteran's symptoms did not interfere with occupational and social functioning nor required continuous medication.,Bilateral pes planus service connection was granted as a new claim, effective April 29, 2011. An earlier date prior to this was denied due to lack of formal or informal claims before this date.,Service connection for a skin disability was denied because the evidence did not identify a current disability and it could not be presumed from service.,Allergic rhinitis was granted as related to active service, resolving doubt in favor of the Veteran.,The claims were reopened due to new and material evidence provided.

Claimed conditions
Impaired fasting glucose, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Allergic rhinitis, Bilateral pes planus, Cervical spine disability, Sinus disability, Lumbosacral spine disability, Bilateral hip disability, Bilateral knee disability, Bilateral ankle disability, Bilateral hallux rigidus
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 2, 2018
Citation
18115500

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18115500.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.