Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's hypertension is remanded for further examination and opinion regarding its etiology.,The Veteran's zoster herpes simplex is remanded to determine if it is related to his in-service treatment for viral meningitis.,The Veteran's blurred vision is remanded to determine if it is related to diabetes.,The Veteran's sleep apnea is remanded to determine if it is related to diabetes.

The deciding factor: The VA examination did not address the possible relationship between the Veteran’s presumed Agent Orange exposure and his hypertension disability, as per NAS Institute of Medicine's Veterans and Agent Orange: Update 2010.,No VA examination has been conducted on this issue. The Board finds that a VA examination is warranted to determine if there is any link between the Veteran's zoster herpes simplex and his in-service treatment for viral meningitis.,The July 2017 VA examination did not address the significant facts of the Veteran’s case regarding blurred vision, diabetes, and service connection. A new examination is needed to provide a proper opinion on these issues.,No VA examination has been conducted on this issue. The Board finds that a VA examination is warranted to determine if there is any link between the Veteran's sleep apnea and his diabetes.

Claimed conditions
Coronary Artery Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension, Blurred Vision, Sleep Apnea
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
July 3, 2018
Citation
18115813

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18115813.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.