Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's claims for residuals of frostbite of both feet were denied as the evidence did not show a current disability and there was no indication that the cold injury during service caused any residual disabilities.,The Veteran's claim for residuals of frostbite of the right foot was denied. The evidence showed that the cold injury resolved prior to separation from service, and there is no indication that it caused any current disabilities.,The Veteran's claim for residuals of frostbite of the left foot was denied. Similar to the right foot, the evidence did not show a current disability and there was no indication that the cold injury during service caused any residual disabilities.,The Veteran's claim for residuals of a head injury was denied as he does not have a currently diagnosed condition.,The Veteran's claims for eye disability (presumed refractive errors) and seizure disorder were denied. The evidence did not show a current disability or indicate that the conditions had their onset during service.

The deciding factor: There is no current diagnosis of residuals of frostbite in either foot, nor any indication that the cold injury sustained during service caused any residual disabilities.,The Veteran's cold injury resolved prior to separation from service and there is no evidence showing a current disability or causation between the cold injury and any current condition.,Similar to the right foot claim, the left foot cold injury resolved prior to separation from service with no indication of current residuals or causation.,There is no currently diagnosed head injury. The Veteran's seizure disorder was not shown to have its onset during service and there is no evidence linking it to a service-connected condition.,The Veteran's refractive errors are considered congenital defects and not disease or injury for VA compensation purposes, and the eye disability claim is denied as there is no indication of superimposed disease or injury. The seizure disorder claim is denied due to lack of evidence showing its onset during service.

Claimed conditions
recurrent ventral hernia, residuals of frostbite of both feet, residuals of a head injury, eye disability (presumed refractive errors), seizure disorder
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 11, 2018
Citation
18117588

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18117588.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.