The Board has determined that there is no current diagnosis of angina, status post stent placement and thus the claim for service connection for this condition cannot be granted. The Veteran's bilateral leg thrombosis was not found to have pre-existed her active duty service or to have been aggravated by it.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found that there is no current diagnosis of angina, status post stent placement and thus the claim for service connection for this condition cannot be granted. The Veteran's bilateral leg thrombosis was not found to have pre-existed her active duty service or to have been aggravated by it.
- Claimed conditions
- angina, bilateral leg thrombosis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 27, 2018
- Citation
- 1812019
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1812019.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's heart disability, claimed as secondary to PTSD, requires further examination and opinion due to a duty to assist error. The case is being remanded for an addendum VA examination.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeal regarding the proposed effective date for the evaluation of coronary artery disease, angina, cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, status post CABG, hypertensive heart disease due to it being premature.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a heart condition, including angina, has been granted due to the submission of new and relevant evidence. The claim for an increased rating for unspecified depressive disorder remains denied.,The Board is remanding the case to consider the newly submitted evidence in determining whether it warrants a higher disability rating for the Veteran's unspecified depressive disorder.
- Granted
The Veteran's claims for service connection have been granted. The Board found that the Veteran's lymphoma is related to his active duty service and has awarded service connection for angina secondary to his service-connected asbestosis.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.