Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's left leg condition, digestive condition to include mild gastritis with an esophageal ulcer, and inguinal hernia are not service-connected.,PTSD is rated at 50 percent but the Veteran contends it should be higher. The case must be remanded for a new VA examination.,The Veteran's head condition and prostate condition are not service-connected. A VA examination is needed to determine if there is a current diagnosis of a head condition, whether it is distinguishable from PTSD, and if there is a medical nexus between the current condition and an in-service incurrence.,A VA examination is needed to determine if there is a current prostate condition and if there is a medical nexus between the current condition and an in-service visit to a urology clinic.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's left leg, digestive, and inguinal hernia conditions are not service-connected due to lack of evidence linking them to service.,PTSD was rated at 50 percent but the Veteran contends it should be higher. A new VA examination is needed to determine if there has been an increase in severity since the last evaluation.,The Veteran's head condition and prostate condition are not service-connected due to lack of evidence linking them to service. A VA examination is needed to determine if there is a current diagnosis and medical nexus.,A VA examination is needed to determine if there is a current prostate condition and if there is a medical nexus between the current condition and an in-service visit to a urology clinic.

Claimed conditions
left leg condition, digestive condition to include mild gastritis with an esophageal ulcer, inguinal hernia
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
July 24, 2018
Citation
18120512

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18120512.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.