The Board has decided to remand the case due to incomplete records and the need for a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's head pain disability.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for additional medical evidence and an examination to clarify the relationship between the Veteran's current condition and his service period.
- Claimed conditions
- head pain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 7, 2018
- Citation
- 18124550
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18124550.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current diagnoses of head pain and vertigo did not begin during service or are otherwise related to an in-service injury, thus denying his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including a new examination to determine if the Veteran's current head pain disability is related to service. The TDIU claim remains pending and will also be remanded.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
Your claim of service connection for headaches, which you claimed was related to a service-connected eye disability, has been granted. However, the appeal is dismissed because your case no longer involves an ongoing controversy as the benefits have already been fully awarded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to inadequate medical opinions and new development is needed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.