The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's pancreatic cancer is caused or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The VA will obtain any outstanding private treatment records and provide a medical opinion on this issue.
The deciding factor: The decision was based on insufficient medical evidence of record, specifically the lack of review of various private treatment records reflecting a June 2014 pancreatic carcinoma diagnosis.
- Claimed conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 9, 2018
- Citation
- 18125219
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18125219.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for further development regarding his claims of service connection for PTSD, a rating increase for PTSD, and service connection for pancreatic cancer secondary to diabetes.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied an earlier effective date for DIC benefits due to the Veteran's cause of death, finding that there was no prior pending claim and that the current grant of service connection for the cause of death is based on direct service connection rather than a presumption.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted readjudication of the claim for entitlement to a TDIU and denied service connection for heart, diabetes mellitus type II, and pancreatic cancer disabilities.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The appeal for an initial compensable evaluation for service-connected hypertension was granted, while the appeals for service connection for pancreatic cancer and special monthly compensation were remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.