The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for upper back condition, left knee injury, left toe condition (claimed as left great toe infection), bilateral eye condition (claimed as bilateral eye irritation), chest condition (claimed as chest pain), and anemia.,Additionally, the Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for a left ankle condition and hypertension.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not establish that the Veteran had any diagnosed disorders or disabilities of the upper back, left knee, left great toe, bilateral eyes, her chest, or anemia during the appeal period. The preponderance of the medical evidence of record did not show these conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- upper back condition, left knee injury, left toe condition (claimed as left great toe infection), bilateral eye condition (claimed as bilateral eye irritation), chest condition (claimed as chest pain), anemia
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 14, 2018
- Citation
- 18126277
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18126277.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC benefits is remanded due to the AOJ's failure to address whether it is in the best interest of the Veteran to participate in the program. The Board finds that the Veteran has been in need of personal care services for at least six continuous months based on an inability to perform the ADL of bathing.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates and increased ratings are being remanded due to the need for further review of the evidence. The Board is unable to determine if there was a factual increase in disability prior to the effective dates requested, or if service connection should be granted based on the current evidence.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not prevent him from maintaining employment in the construction industry, and he was able to work with accommodations such as sedentary work and frequent breaks. The Board denied his claim for a TDIU.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for service connection for various conditions have been dismissed as untimely.,Service connection for PTSD has not been established.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.