The Board has remanded the case due to a need for an opinion regarding whether the Veteran had early-onset peripheral neuropathy prior to his death, given his presumed exposure to herbicides during service.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for additional medical evaluation and opinion regarding the presence of early-onset peripheral neuropathy in the Veteran's case.
- Claimed conditions
- early-onset peripheral neuropathy
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 27, 2018
- Citation
- 18129577
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18129577.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for ischemic heart disease and early-onset peripheral neuropathy, finding no evidence of these conditions during the Veteran's service or after. The earliest effective date for entitlement to service connection for the Veteran's cause of death was February 3, 2006.
- Dismissed
The appeal for service connection for early-onset peripheral neuropathy was dismissed due to an improper concurrent election.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for PTSD and early-onset peripheral neuropathy are being remanded due to pending development requests. The TDIU claim is also being remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claims for type II diabetes mellitus, early-onset peripheral neuropathy, and chloracne or other acneform disease consistent with chloracne due to herbicide exposure. The decision is based on the need for additional development regarding whether the Veteran served within the 12 nautical mile territorial sea of the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.