The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for her service-connected right sacroiliac joint dysfunction and hysterectomy are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and consideration of new evidence.
The deciding factor: The Board is unable to make a determination on the merits without further examination and review of the claimant's medical records, as the current evidence does not provide sufficient information about the severity and nature of her service-connected conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- Right sacroiliac joint dysfunction, Status post hysterectomy and lysis for polycystic ovaries and pelvic adhesive disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 27, 2018
- Citation
- 18129578
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18129578.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's right sacroiliac joint dysfunction has been characterized by pain and limited forward flexion, but does not meet the criteria for a higher initial rating.
- Denied
The VA denied the veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 20 percent for his service-connected low back disorder, finding that the orthopedic findings are primarily manifested by pain and limited motion.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.