Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for insomnia has been denied as his current sleep impairment is already contemplated in the rating assigned to his depressive disorder.,The earlier effective date for service connection of unspecified depressive disorder with anxious distress has been denied because the earliest date that the Veteran expressed an intent to reopen his claim, September 8, 2012, is the currently assigned effective date.,The Veteran's claim for a higher evaluation for his depressive disorder with anxious distress has been remanded as his symptoms do not meet the criteria for a 100% rating under Diagnostic Code 9411.

The deciding factor: The Veteran’s current sleep impairment is already contemplated in the rating assigned to his service-connected unspecified depressive disorder, and therefore does not warrant separate service connection.,The earliest date that the Veteran expressed an intent to reopen his claim for service connection of unspecified depressive disorder with anxious distress was September 8, 2012, which is the currently assigned effective date. Therefore, no earlier effective date can be granted.,The Veteran's symptoms do not meet the criteria for a 100% rating under Diagnostic Code 9411 as they do not include gross impairment in thought processes or communication; persistent delusions or hallucinations; grossly inappropriate behavior; persistent danger of hurting self or others; intermittent inability to perform activities of daily living (including maintenance of minimal personal hygiene); disorientation to time or place; memory loss for names of close relatives, own occupation, or own name.

Claimed conditions
Insomnia, Depressive Disorder with Anxious Distress
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
70%
Decision date
August 29, 2018
Citation
18129733

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18129733.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.