Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's right shoulder injury residuals are not service-connected.,The Veteran's neck injury residuals are not service-connected.,Service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder (to include PTSD) is not established.,Service connection for food poisoning residuals is not established.,Service connection for a chronic lung disability is not established.,A higher evaluation in excess of 10 percent prior to April 27, 2016, and in excess of 30 percent thereafter for migraine headaches is denied.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's right shoulder injury residuals did not manifest during service or within the applicable presumptive period.,There was no evidence of neck pain or injury in service. The VA examiner failed to address whether diagnosed degenerative changes and cervical stenosis were caused by a head impact (TBI).,Service treatment records contained no documentation or treatment for PTSD, depression, schizoaffective disorder, cognitive disorder, mood disorder, adjustment disorder, or schizotypal personality disorder.,The Veteran's service treatment records did not contain any documentation of food poisoning. The VA examiner failed to address whether the Veteran’s H. Pylori infection and gastroesophageal reflux disease were related to confirmed food poisoning in service.,Service treatment records contained no documentation or treatment for a chronic lung disability. The VA examiner did not provide an etiology opinion regarding the Veteran's contentions of paint exposure during service or service treatment records showing he complained of coughing up blood and wore a respirator.,The Veteran’s migraine headaches were productive of characteristic prostrating attacks averaging one in two months over several months prior to April 27, 2016, and more frequently than once per month thereafter.

Claimed conditions
right shoulder injury, neck injury, acquired psychiatric disorder (to include PTSD), food poisoning, chronic lung disability
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 28, 2018
Citation
18129874

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18129874.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.