The Veteran's chronic ischemic heart disease is rated at 100 percent, the highest possible rating. The Board granted this higher evaluation based on evidence showing that his service-connected condition alone resulted in a METs level of 3 or less.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence showed that the Veteran’s service-connected chronic ischemic heart disease alone was responsible for a workload of 1-3 metabolic equivalents (METs), which is below the threshold required for a higher evaluation.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic ischemic heart disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 29, 2018
- Citation
- 18130636
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18130636.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The appeal for special monthly pension (SMP) based on the need for regular aid and attendance or housebound status is remanded to ensure that the appellant receives every possible consideration, including a new VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to issues with the appellant's address and a need for further examination. The SMP claim is still pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's heart disability and its relationship to service, as well as the lack of verification for radiation exposure in Korea. The case will be returned to the AOJ for further development.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection for a heart disability, including coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic ischemic heart disease, and cardiac arrhythmia, unspecified. The evidence shows current diagnoses of these conditions, with an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence as to whether they manifested during service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.