The Veteran's right knee disability, specifically Osgood-Schlatter disease, is being remanded for a new examination to comply with Correia and Sharp requirements due to the lack of passive range of motion measurements and pain on weight-bearing testing in the previous VA examination.
The deciding factor: The previous VA examination did not meet the requirements set forth in Correia v. McDonald (2016) and Sharp v. Shulkin (2017), which require specific range of motion measurements and consideration of pain during flare-ups.
- Claimed conditions
- Osgood-Schlatter disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 17, 2018
- Citation
- 18135102
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18135102.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's request to reverse the February 1, 1980 rating decision on the basis of clear and unmistakable error (CUE) because the September 2018 Board decision subsumed the earlier RO decision.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for a right knee disability diagnosed as Osgood-Schlatter disease, finding that the Veteran's condition was related to his active duty service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for Osgood-Schlatter disease and chondromalacia with right knee pain due to a lack of an adequate etiology opinion. The Veteran's symptoms must be evaluated by a VA examiner.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for an increased rating and service connection due to pre-decisional duty to assist errors, requiring additional medical examinations and opinions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.