The Board has decided to remand the case for further examination and opinion regarding whether the Veteran's left eye disability is due to VA treatment, specifically surgeries performed in July 2012, December 2012, and January 2013 at the Ann Arbor VAMC. The examiner will need to assess if the additional disability was caused by carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment or similar instance of fault on VA's part.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for further examination and opinion regarding causation and fault due to the surgeries performed at the VAMC
- Claimed conditions
- Left eye disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 18, 2018
- Citation
- 18135132
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18135132.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for various disabilities, including an acquired psychiatric disability, alcohol abuse, a liver disability, and hand and eye disabilities, as the evidence did not support a finding that these conditions were related to service or secondary to any service-connected condition.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for his left eye disability and residuals of prostate cancer, as the evidence did not support higher ratings under the applicable criteria.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, right shoulder disability, left elbow disability, right elbow disability, left ankle disability, and right ankle disability as the evidence did not support a finding of a current disability related to service. The claims for psychiatric disability, obstructive sleep apnea, left eye disability, right eye disability, cervical spine disability, and left shoulder disability were remanded.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's request to readjudicate his claims for service connection for right and left eye disabilities, finding that new and relevant evidence had not been submitted to warrant such a readjudication.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.